| Federation of Urban
Neighbourhoods News Article CATCH News - The mayor of Hamilton, Larry DiIanni, is being
accused of dozens of violations of the Municipal Elections Act. A
business-woman and former In a 14-page letter to the City Clerk, bookstore
owner Joanna Chapman detailed irregularities in the campaign
contributions of more than 60 corporations and individuals. Chapman
found eight separate instances in which DiIanni reported receiving more
than the legally allowable maximum funding from a single contributor.
In each case, DiIanni's election documents list two or more donations
with identical names and address that total more than $750. In addition, Chapman's investigations of
corporate donors to the mayor's campaign turned up a dozen instances in
which apparently associated companies made total donations over the
limit. The Municipal Election Act says that corporations associated
with each other as defined by federal income tax laws
"shall be deemed to be a single corporation" for the
purposes of the Act. One example identified by Chapman was $750
donations from each of St. Laurence Cement, Dufferin Construction and
TCG Asphalt & Construction. St. Laurence owns the other two
companies. Another cited three companies with "A DeSantis"
in their name that Chapman says have "identical officers". They also
share the same address and donated a total of $1200 to DiIanni's
campaign. Chapman's list includes some curiosities such as
three numbered companies that share an address with both Losani Homes
and Losani Homes (1998) Ltd. Together the five companies donated $3500
to DiIanni's campaign. Chapman believes they are associated and notes
that "the principal corporate directors have the same first names but
varied spellings of the family name on their corporate documents -
Losani, Liosani and Osani - however, they utilize the same residential
address and appear to be all the same family." Only individuals, unions or corporations are
eligible to make campaign contributions, but Chapman says several
companies that gave money to DiIanni "cannot be traced as corporate
names". She also questions the propriety
of DiIanni and several other candidates taking donations from the Chapman is alleging obvious or potential
violations by councillors Tom Jackson, Bill Kelly and Terry Whitehead,
as well as by defeated candidates Anne Bain, John Best, Marvin Caplan,
Peter Martin and George Morasse. She has asked that each of these
campaigns also be subjected to compliance audits. Kelly's contributions are also the subject of a
second audit request filed yesterday by Alice H. Smith who cited
similar violations to those noted by Chapman. The two letters were surprise additions to the
agenda of tonight's meeting of Hamilton City Council. They were
received without discussion and referred to the City Clerk for a report
due on July 14. Council must decide within 30 days whether or not to
order the requested audits. If they reject the requests, Chapman and
Smith would be free to take their concerns to a judge. A candidate who violates the Muncipal Elections
Act can be fined up to $5000 for each offence. The penalty for
corporations is up to $25,000 per offence. The full text of both Chapman's and Smith's
letters are available on request from CATCH in the form of PDFs. The
Municipal Elections Act can be examined on-line at http://www.canlii.org/on/laws/sta/1996c.32sch./20040503/whole.html. |